<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In praise of jargon &#8211; a defence of the apparently indefensible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/</link>
	<description>public speaking, speech writing, speech coaching, presentation skills training, messages that stick.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:10:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Hendren - presentation skills trainer</title>
		<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Hendren - presentation skills trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativityworks.net/?p=760#comment-270</guid>
		<description>I think the jargon phrases that people react negatively to are the over used &quot;management speak&quot; dinosaurs as lampooned in the Ricky Gervais show The Office. The problem is not so much with the metaphors and phrases but the fact that people tend to trot them out and hide behind them. Instead of taking significant action to make improvement. There is no sense in telling somebody that &quot;there is no I in team&quot; if you don&#039;t then give further instruction as to how the team work can be improved. If the phrase is linked with good teaching it is useful. If it just trotted out and not followed up then it becomes the type of management jargon that makes peoples blood boil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the jargon phrases that people react negatively to are the over used &#8220;management speak&#8221; dinosaurs as lampooned in the Ricky Gervais show The Office. The problem is not so much with the metaphors and phrases but the fact that people tend to trot them out and hide behind them. Instead of taking significant action to make improvement. There is no sense in telling somebody that &#8220;there is no I in team&#8221; if you don&#8217;t then give further instruction as to how the team work can be improved. If the phrase is linked with good teaching it is useful. If it just trotted out and not followed up then it becomes the type of management jargon that makes peoples blood boil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativityworks.net/?p=760#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Agreed, workplace environments should encourage people to come up with their own metaphors to help explain to others what it is they are doing and trying to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, workplace environments should encourage people to come up with their own metaphors to help explain to others what it is they are doing and trying to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life After PowerPoint! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Meaningless Metaphors</title>
		<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Life After PowerPoint! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Meaningless Metaphors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativityworks.net/?p=760#comment-264</guid>
		<description>[...] great post from the people at CreativityWorks about metaphors and their misuse got me thinking. It is truly worth reading. (I&#8217;m using some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] great post from the people at CreativityWorks about metaphors and their misuse got me thinking. It is truly worth reading. (I&#8217;m using some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ole Martinson</title>
		<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Ole Martinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativityworks.net/?p=760#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Martin.  

Yes, we should challenge unclear metaphors, in our world where new words seem to blossom freely as if there is a conscious effort to shorten the sound bite.
 There is, of course, nothing wrong in the use of creative language or jargonistic descriptions, especially if it evokes a mental image or an experience to amplify the intended message.  Mix colour, context and passion to the topic and you have the making of a refreshing brew.
As a professional communicator I visualise our body as the delivery instrument.  There are many strings to bend that bow - active listening, questioning, body language, movement, voice intonation, pace, projection, to name a few.  We all have them but only too often we don&#039;t use them to best effect.  Words are simply the arrows we send.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Martin.  </p>
<p>Yes, we should challenge unclear metaphors, in our world where new words seem to blossom freely as if there is a conscious effort to shorten the sound bite.<br />
 There is, of course, nothing wrong in the use of creative language or jargonistic descriptions, especially if it evokes a mental image or an experience to amplify the intended message.  Mix colour, context and passion to the topic and you have the making of a refreshing brew.<br />
As a professional communicator I visualise our body as the delivery instrument.  There are many strings to bend that bow &#8211; active listening, questioning, body language, movement, voice intonation, pace, projection, to name a few.  We all have them but only too often we don&#8217;t use them to best effect.  Words are simply the arrows we send.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Restell</title>
		<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Restell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativityworks.net/?p=760#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Martin.  Orwell must be smiling somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Martin.  Orwell must be smiling somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Lakin</title>
		<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Lakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativityworks.net/?p=760#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Excellent piece, Martin, right out of the top drawer.
Best
Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent piece, Martin, right out of the top drawer.<br />
Best<br />
Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For Grammarians: Martin Shovel takes on Jargon</title>
		<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>For Grammarians: Martin Shovel takes on Jargon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativityworks.net/?p=760#comment-250</guid>
		<description>[...] the whole post for Martin&#8217;s explanation of why clear speaking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the whole post for Martin&#8217;s explanation of why clear speaking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Tomlinson</title>
		<link>http://www.creativityworks.net/in-praise-of-jargon-a-defence-of-the-apparently-indefensible/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Tomlinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativityworks.net/?p=760#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Great article Martin and I hope Radio 4’s interest will drive even more business your way. Your business certainly appears in its ascendancy at the moment and for good reason. Examples of poor communication are increasing, seemingly in direct correlation to companies allowing control over what’s published on their internet sites to be set to ‘live’ without the necessary proof reading of a team members phraseology…  As an aside, we trademarked the expression &#039;think inside the box&#039; - with obvious reference to one&#039;s inability to see Aquapax water within a paper carton – however, the motivation to trademark it was precisely because of the widespread ignorance surrounding the more widely used original metaphor…
Warm wishes
Neil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Martin and I hope Radio 4’s interest will drive even more business your way. Your business certainly appears in its ascendancy at the moment and for good reason. Examples of poor communication are increasing, seemingly in direct correlation to companies allowing control over what’s published on their internet sites to be set to ‘live’ without the necessary proof reading of a team members phraseology…  As an aside, we trademarked the expression &#8216;think inside the box&#8217; &#8211; with obvious reference to one&#8217;s inability to see Aquapax water within a paper carton – however, the motivation to trademark it was precisely because of the widespread ignorance surrounding the more widely used original metaphor…<br />
Warm wishes<br />
Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

